On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:32:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 19:41 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > I uploaded and it just got accepted. Unfortunately the older autotools did > > break something, it seems that upstream used a broken libtool that used > > /usr/lib64 and /lib64 instead of /usr/lib and /lib so an RPATH was being > > hardcoded into the binaries. I fixed it by patching the libtool and > > prepending > > /usr/lib and /lib with a simple sed line: > > > > sed -i -r > > 's,^sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="(.*)$$,sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec="/usr/lib > > /lib \1,' $(CURDIR)/libtool > > I've not unblocked the package yet, as it requires a newer > geany-plugins-common; hopefully that can be resolved soon.
As geany does not depend on the plugins, and they are broken anyhow with the 0.19 vs 0.18 currently on testing, could we let 0.19.1 through to testing? That wouldn't change the status of the plugins AFAIK. Damián Viano. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100920123845.ga11...@damianv.com.ar
