Le vendredi 19 novembre 2010 à 01:24 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 00:55:55 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > > > > > > Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be > > > > > enough ? or do I need to upload a new version of jogl ? > > > > > > > > > I've scheduled a binNMU, let's see if that works. > > > > > > > So that part worked, but then scilab FTBFS: > > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=scilab;ver=5.2.2-9;arch=mips;stamp=1290100241 > > Scilab FTBFS because on this build log, gcj is used while it should use > > the openjdk instead. (it won't be possible to port Scilab on gcj since > > it is using part some Java API which are not supported by gcj). > > > > The openjdk is available for mips: > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/openjdk-6-jdk > > but it seems that default-jdk is not set up correctly. > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/default-jdk > > > > Am I right ? > > > > Should I report a bug on default-jdk here ? > > > It seems late to make such a change of default jdk; I don't know if it's > a bug... But if scilab needs openjdk anyway, should it really use > default-jdk instead of build-depending on openjdk directly? Probably not. > (There's still the option of getting the old scilab binary removed from > mips.) It is no big deal if Scilab is not available under mips. If it is ok with you, we could go in this direction.
Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1290126537.28387.658.ca...@zlarin
