On 23/11/2010 12:17, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:33:29 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601971 . Now, it has >>> been found that that bug is not due to liboauth (see last comment on >>> that bug about the fact that twitter OAuth works). Its a problem with >>> bti, in which bti is using identi.ca where OAuth is not needed. >> Is it possible for identi.ca users to still use bti? The reason to have >> liboauth in Squeeze is to allow bti to work with Twitter. But, if it >> introduces a regression (here wrt. identi.ca) then, it won't be unblocked. > > bti works for identi.ca with Basic Auth (broken is "only" the new > feature with OAuth, so there's no regression. of course it would be > nicer with this feature unbroken, that's why I've waited for an > upstream fix.)) >
Is there a fix already? > Cheers, > gregor > -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cebaefe.1030...@dogguy.org
