On Dec 16, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > > CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. > I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight LVM is unreliable in squeeze.
> it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see > in squeeze? The upstream maintainer requested that the udev rules are updated, and so I did. I even added back a bug to udev because this was not fixed. The maintainer did not provide any counterargument. What else should I do? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
