Hi, On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:02:45PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 15:58 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > > As discussed with Moritz from the security team there won't be any > > security support from upstream for any of the beta releases. So I added > > a note explaining that to README.Debian: > > > > * [a8de458] Switch to source format 3.0 (quilt) > > * [b92405c] Add watch file > > * [5a9ee07] Add security update notice to README.Debian > > > > If this isn't deemed enough we need to remove iceowl entirely from > > testing. > > Apologies for having failed to follow this up again earlier. > > Just to check that we're all on the same page, having read the addition > to README.Debian, does this mean that there won't be any updates at all > to the package via security.d.o during squeeze's lifetime?
Yes. A way out of this would be to switch iceowl over to icedove's orig tarball which gets at least the xulrunner fixes (both are based on comm-central) which would only leave the calendaring part out in the cold. Since I didn't get around to do this for the past four weeks it's unlikely I'll manage till the release though. Cheers, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101224082209.gc4...@bogon.sigxcpu.org
