On Sat, January 15, 2011 09:52, Alexander Wirt wrote: > Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Saturday, den 15. January 2011: > >> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> > Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13. January 2011: >> > >> > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100 >> > > Alexander Wirt <formo...@formorer.de> wrote: >> > > > Any new about the NMU? >> [...] >> > > The source package's URL (ready for `dget`) is [1]. >> > > >> > > 1. >> http://sites.google.com/site/khomoutov/debian/ndoutils_1.4b9-1.1.dsc >> > Uploaded. >> >> Thanks; unblocked. > Great!
Unfortunately, I failed to notice that this isn't as straight forward as it seemed. The version of nagios3 which is in unstable has built binary packages for kfreebsd-*, whereas the package in testing has not. This means that the kfreebsd-* ndoutils packages depend on nagios3 and britney is refusing to migrate the package as they would be uninstallable. So far as I can see, the possible options are: - release without ndoutils after all - get the kfreebsd-* ndoutils packages removed from unstable - use the largest hammer britney has to force the packages in regardless, and then ask ftpmaster to remove the kfreebsd-* binaries - upload ndoutils built against testing's nagios3 to t-p-u, with a version number such as 1.4b9-1.1~squeeze1, in order to be lower than the unstable version My preference would be for the final option, assuming the upload could be performed soon. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e339f4bbf6ee687c39bd83ea14d4c2bf.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
