On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:30:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > We should keep both SONAMES in sid and wheezy for now, IMO. So I think > that means first upload openssl 1.0.0 as a new source package without > the -dev (this can probably happen now). Then when that's in testing > and you get an ack, switch the -dev from 0.9.8 to 1.0.0.
If all you want to do is to have both libssl0.9.8 and libssl1.0.0 both in testing at the same time, I don't see why you want to do it like that. I could just upload a openssl098 source package just containing libssl0.9.8(-dbg), and have the openssl source package provide libssl1.0.0 and libssl-dev. It shouldn't take that long for the openssl098 pacakge to migrate to testing. I could also upload an openssl098 source package that provides the libssl0.9.8(-dbg) and libssl-dev binary package. And I would upload an openssl source package that provides libssl1.0.0(-dbg), openssl, and libcrypto1.0.0-udeb, so without -dev package. And once openssl098 is migrated to testing I could change the -dev package. But it seems to be more work, and I don't see the what that would gain us. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110318223217.ga3...@roeckx.be