retitle 624768 RFH: libnss-db reassign 624768 wnpp thank you On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 22:58, Peter Palfrader <wea...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, 02 May 2011, Ondrej Surý wrote: > >> Well, libnss-ldap(d) + NSCD could do the trick for short offline >> periods (with HA LDAP setup). >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/LDAP/NSS > > I don't think libpam-ldap would meet our requirements. And nscd is best > avoided.
Then somebody should step-up and give a libnss-db little love. It's shame we couldn't push it to GSoC now :(. Unfortunately it's so far away from DNS as it could be, so I am probably not be able to adopt it in our labs and I have already too many tasks on my shoulder. So I cannot really promise anything, but if I catch some spare cycles somewhere and nothing happens here, I'll at least fix the security issue and libdb transition in a NMU. However I still think that from a long term this needs to be Reassigning to wnpp as a RFH and Ccing 604854 (which is about building libnss-db from eglibc). O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> http://blog.rfc1925.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTikqmFWf5iCJ6_Q0E8LVd8B9e=8...@mail.gmail.com
