* Thijs Kinkhorst (th...@debian.org) [110808 10:35]: > Hi, > > On Mon, August 1, 2011 23:07, Neil McGovern wrote: > > Carried forward from last release: > > - IPv6 support > > - Large File Support > > I'm wondering why these two are still goals for the current cycle. I think > it's safe to say that their intent has already been achieved (make Debian > generally work well with IPv6/LFS). What's left now is some specific bugs > tagged ipv6 or lfs, but these lists will probably never be completely > empty. Making a sprint on these subjects with etch and lenny was useful, > but now we've now reached the stage where bugs in these systems are valid > and should be fixed, but aren't fundamendamentally different from any > other set of bugs. > > They aren't formulated in a SMART way, and it's not clear (to me at least) > what in the wheezy cycle specifically is expected to happen that needs > release goal status. My conclusion would be to just drop the goals: > they've already been successful.
This means to me mostly "bugs regarding these topics continue to stay (at least) important, and can be NMUed as RC bugs". Perhaps such clean-up tasks should be moved somewhere else, but until that is done, I think release goals is still the appropriate headings for it. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110808224324.gr15...@mails.so.argh.org
