On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:03 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]:
> > > On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 22:22 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:
> > > > update-inetd parses successfully the /proc/pid/stat file of inetd only 
> > > > when
> > > > the latter comes from the default "Provides: inet-superserver" package 
> > > > (ie.
> > > > openbsd-inetd) but fails to do so for inetutils-inetd and rlinetd.
> > > 
> > > What about xinetd?
> > 
> > The patched code is within an inetd-specific (read: non-xinetd) if clause 
> > for
> > sending a SIGHUP. That's never the case for xinetd[0] which is restarted via
> > invoke-rc.d instead.
> 
> Ah, okay.  Please go ahead; thanks.

The upload happened, and I've flagged the package for acceptance at the
next dinstall.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1316383386.21594.169.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to