On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:03 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:33:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote [edited]: > > > On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 22:22 +0200, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > > > > update-inetd parses successfully the /proc/pid/stat file of inetd only > > > > when > > > > the latter comes from the default "Provides: inet-superserver" package > > > > (ie. > > > > openbsd-inetd) but fails to do so for inetutils-inetd and rlinetd. > > > > > > What about xinetd? > > > > The patched code is within an inetd-specific (read: non-xinetd) if clause > > for > > sending a SIGHUP. That's never the case for xinetd[0] which is restarted via > > invoke-rc.d instead. > > Ah, okay. Please go ahead; thanks.
The upload happened, and I've flagged the package for acceptance at the next dinstall. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316383386.21594.169.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org