On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 16:40 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > On 09/22/2011 08:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:55 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > >> Didn't include the #525415 fix here, or would you say it's ok too? > > > > How confident are you that it wouldn't cause regressions on oldstable? > > Assuming we run to schedule (which hasn't happened for a while now, > > sadly), oldstable point releases only occur once every four months. > > Assuming it was always built in a clean chroot it was never built with > any kernel-headers as those were not installed in the path the Makefile > was looking in. Just build-tested it in cowbuilder and seems fine. > Diff is here: > > http://pinky.die-welt.net/~evgeni/tmp/v86d-CVE-2011-1070-oldstable%2bkernel.diff > > said that, i'm pretty confident that there are about zero v86d users in > oldstable (it's designed for desktops where you usually do not run > oldish releases, esp with outdated binary drivers)
Please go ahead. (Bearing in mind that uploads for the oldstable point release next weekend close within the next few hours). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1316961890.2091.181.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
