On 12/15/2011 11:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > (and to which you appear to have ignored the response, at least > publicly)
that response was a non-sequitur. > That mail says you'd like to know "the rough estimated date" for > planning purposes, [...] exactely.. > The purpose of the initial co-ordination mails is precisely to narrow > that "rough estimated date" to an exact date ..which is why we want to be cc'ed, it's as simple as that. > (Actually, in both of those cases fixes generally get worked on and > uploaded throughout the cycle rather than just towards the end, which is > arguably a better workflow for all involved.) you should know by now that -live works a bit different wrt/ releases due to the fact, that it has to adapt to all changes *after* everyone (-kernel, -boot, -release, -ftp) has done them. > Then I suspect you haven't read the above. Hopefully it does some good > for someone, in any case. it is always a good thing to allege the other one is not reading stuff if the initial problem solely lies in the own ignorance of the issue; or not. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eeb03af.1080...@progress-technologies.net
