On 03.03.2012 16:07, Robert Millan wrote:
AFAICS the only remaining issues are:

freebsd-buildutils is only 8 days old. It must be 10 days old to go in. kfreebsd-kernel-headers is only 4 days old. It must be 10 days old
to go in.

Well, there's also freebsd-utils (5/10 days) and:

out of date on kfreebsd-amd64: libcam0, libsbuf0, libsbuf0-udeb, libusb2, libusb2-udeb, libusbhid4 (from 8.3~svn229725-3) out of date on kfreebsd-i386: libcam0, libsbuf0, libsbuf0-udeb, libusb2, libusb2-udeb, libusbhid4 (from 8.3~svn229725-3)

The final uploads to make the latter go away were made earlier today, so I've asked for them to be decrufted.

Instead of waiting one more week, perhaps it'd make sense to force
migration of those two packages?  In both cases the majority of
changes in update have been tested in unstable for more than 10 days
already.

Oddly enough, we'd already had that idea... :)

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/44b0143bbf55c9ccb919f34ccd5e3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to