Thijs Kinkhorst <th...@debian.org> (18/03/2012):
> Perhaps you want to consider gnupg 1.4.12 too? It has been in unstable for
> 17 days (change in 1.4.12-4 was only relevant for debian-ports archs) and
> no issues have been reported.

Looks good, done so.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to