Hi, Julien: > rm hints added.
This is a bit rude (not your fault). AFAIK, we * haven't be notified of this removal. [*]: the pkg-kolab maintainers (no mention of it in #647221, for example) Moritz: > They are as unmaintained as kolab-cyrus-imapd and virtually unused in popcon. Let's just drop them along. How do you know that they are unmaitained? kolab-cyrus-imapd is in a bad shape, but this primarly comes from its parent package (cyrus-imapd-2.2, now removed from tesing/unstable). Others are in good shape. [...] > > > It should be build from the standard Cyrus package for Wheezy > > > (#647221) > > > > Is there any sign of that actually happening? > > No idea. There is some work ongoing in SVN to make the kolabd package depend on the standard cyrus-imapd (with important configuration changes). It is not uploaded yet because of lack of time (mainly from me, only active maintainer). Removal from testing is probably the right thing to do, but *with notice*. Kolab has had a previous late removal from testing (just before lenny), which is sad and counter-productive. Regards -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAFX5sbxS27+H6msx-0f_FdSQ+_=6oohk6-7oq93pyp0jjrr...@mail.gmail.com
