Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:54:17 +0100 with message-id <1334084057.8630.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#668206: nmu: rebuild against libsword9 has caused the Debian Bug report #668206, regarding nmu: rebuild against libsword9 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 668206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668206 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule the following nmu to migrate to new libsword9 library. nmu biblememorizer . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" nmu bibletime . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" nmu xiphos . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" dw biblememorizer . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" dw bibletime . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" dw xiphos . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" -- Regards, Dmitrijs.signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 18:40 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Please schedule the following nmu to migrate to new libsword9 library. This should really be a transition bug, not an NMU request; as such, it should also preferably have been filed /before/ you started the transition, not afterwards... However, as it doesn't appear to clash with any other ongoing transitions - scheduled. > nmu biblememorizer . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" > nmu bibletime . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" > nmu xiphos . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9" > > dw biblememorizer . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" > dw bibletime . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" > dw xiphos . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3" The latter argument to a dep-wait is a package relationship so "libsword-dev (>= 1.6.2+dfsg-3)". "libsword9" was easier though, so I used that. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---