Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0200 with message-id <20120412184033.gw22...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#668461: RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #668461, regarding RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 668461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hello, request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance mode by upstream) branch of RT, and it shouldn't be released with wheezy. There is an RC bug #647126 to hint that it shouldn't be released, but I'd quite like to have it removed from testing now to bring any issues out of the woodwork before it is removed altogether (having it unstable for a little while long will also be useful for maintaining backports, should there be further upstream releases). Thanks, Dominic.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 00:13:41 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance > mode by upstream) branch of RT, and it shouldn't be released with > wheezy. There is an RC bug #647126 to hint that it shouldn't be > released, but I'd quite like to have it removed from testing now to > bring any issues out of the woodwork before it is removed altogether > (having it unstable for a little while long will also be useful for > maintaining backports, should there be further upstream releases). > remove hint added. Might be worth filing a bug against the release-notes pseudo-package (tagged 'wheezy') so we don't forget to mention this before the release, if there's something users need to do to get their installation properly upgraded? Thanks, Juliensignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---