On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 08:20:13PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > For security updates (i.e. after release), we need two DSAed buildds. > Having DSAed buildds allows also to do autosigning, which shortens the > time span for getting builds into the archive. This isn't strictly > required, but not doing so will sometimes lead to annoying delays for > testing transitions (when the architecture is in testing, and the mark > "this arch is too slow" removed).
The security team basically already requires autosigning for security suites. But given that we only build security on DSAed buildds, the two can go hand in hand. Just a very minor clarification. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature