On 6/1/12, Michael Banck <mba...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:18:30PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: >> On 28/05/12 01:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> > On 29/05/12 19:57, Andreas Barth wrote: >> > > [...] we add hurd-i386 to testing with >> > > break/fucked, but we don't expect it to make the release. I.e. bugs >> > > for hurd-i386 are not RC. >> > >> > Maybe that's all that's needed? >> > >> > The recent enthusiasm sounds to me like an opportunity. An official >> > testing suite in the archive, from which usable installer images can be >> > built, could be what encourages hurd-i386 to progress into something >> > really releasable. If this doesn't happen now while there's some >> > momentum, it might never happen again and that would be a shame. >> >> >From the one of the porters side, this would be a _very_ good solution >> indeed! If GNU/Hurd enters som kind of testing status, the number of >> users and contributors will increase (hopefully). Can it be part of >> testing and then when the release happens, be treated specially? > > As I understand it, this has been discussed but deemed not > possible/worthwhile. > >> And most packages will be located in the main repo, only the packages >> having patches, not yet handled by the DMs, being there. Is that >> possible? > > What do you mean with "there"? Either there is a testing distribution, > or there is not, as far as Debian is concerned. > > > Michael > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hurd-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/20120601235418.gr10...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cae219abue+uz-54frdcoaclcog4pyu3b5oe9shi5z7drhqe...@mail.gmail.com