On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:36:40AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >> Does this mean M-A:same packages should be prevented from being >> binNMUed, but only source upload can be accepted? > > You cannot deprive the Release Team of this tool. Also multiarch bugs are IMHO > at most important, not serious. Possibly we could allow one last sourceful > upload when the transitions all settled, but it would again increase the > review > load on the release team. > > IMHO it's on the "if it works, fine, if not, sorry about that" part of the > list, given that it was finalized so late, with that critical piece missing.
Wouldn't the ideal solution be non-architecture-specific changelogs? So, a normal binnmu changelog looks like this now: package (version) sid; urgency=low * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for amd64; no source changes. -- amd64 Builddd Daemon (barber) <buildd_amd64-bar...@buildd.debian.org> Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:33:05 +0000 which could be changed to something like this instead: package (version) sid; urgency=low * Binary-only non-maintainer upload; no source changes. -- Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org> Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:33:05 +0000 or some other appropriate binnmu mailing address. This would also mean rebuilding all of the other architectures for multi-arch same packages so that they all get the same changelog. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpzr8wmwtrg4geqe5tscxhavcbiceny1wnp0zutf_c...@mail.gmail.com
