Hi, On Mon, 14 May 2012 01:00:40 +0200, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 00:30:10 +0200, Nicolas Boullis wrote: > > ¹ I somehow missed the requirement to request transitions as bug reports > > against the release.debian.org pseudo-package, and asked it about 2 > > months ago as a simple e-mail to debian-release@l.d.o, but my message > > remained unanswered. > > > Not really a requirement, but the bts makes tracking stuff easier. In > any case our backlog for transition requests is longer than two months > right now, unfortunately.
As you (Julien) discovered, mednafen has a potential FTBFS related to its construction of Built-Using (#677867). Given that the current package binNMU'd correctly on all platforms except hurd-i386, I suppose I should wait until the libcdio transition is over before uploading a fix, shouldn't I? The reason I ask is since other packages are holding up the transition, I wondered if fixing a potential FTBFS warranted an upload despite the transition. I've uploaded a new version of the experimental version of mednafen, with only the fix for #677867, and that built correctly on hurd-i386. Regards, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
