Hi, On Tue Jun 19, 2012 at 13:16:33 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on > >it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of > >the Urgency field: > > > >* Urgency high to beat the freeze. > > > >As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at various > >points before that) if you have serious concerns that important updates > >to your package won't be included in the release, the correct approach > >is to talk to us, not try and work around us. The net effect of the > >above is more likely to be that the urgency will be overriden on the > >britney side as if the package had been uploaded with a lower urgency. > > How would this work? Will you modify the script to look for such cases?
britney can set a flag called "age-days X", which means that the page needs to be at least X days old in unstable before it may migrate into testing (with a bit of more magic...). At least it was like this when i was in the release team. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org> | Debian System Administrator Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B | GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120619114839.gh20...@ftbfs.de