Hello Jeroen,

Jeroen Dekkers <jer...@dekkers.ch> (06/07/2012):
> Last Friday I had prepared sbjsob/sope/sogo packages to be in time for
> the freeze, but unfortunately Jelmer (my sponsor) didn't manage to
> upload them on Saturday, so I would like to ask for a freeze
> exception. The new packages adds hardening, a lot of bugfixes and one
> new feature that I think is also important to have in wheezy: the
> addition of more secure hash functions. Currently the SQL user backend
> only has unsalted MD5 and SHA1, the new version adds salting, SHA256
> and SHA512.

I think it would make it easier for us to have one bug per source
package, so that we can review them separately, instead of having to
look at the 3 of them at once.

> I've attached the debdiff of the 3 sources packages, and for sogo and
> sope both a simpler diff between the git branches with debian patches
> applied and excluding the debian/patches directory. This gives a
> better overview of what really changed because the backporting from
> upstream and the merging by upstream of my patches gives a lot of
> noise, especially with sope. Note that the OpenChange directory, while
> it is part of upstream source, isn't enabled by SOGo 1.3 (it's only
> enabled in SOGo 2.0).

Thanks for that.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to