On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:34:23AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > So as long as there isn't 8.12 shipped with 8.13 intermixed I guess we can > > take the risk. > > > I'm not willing to ignore this, sorry.
At first I was tempted to say "and rightfully so". But upon further thought I think we have other package with the same/similar problems. Just look at all the packages that have a shared lib but no dev files at all, libs that are only used by that one package itself. I doubt people worry about major version numbers. BTW we also have libs with version 0.0.0 it seems. Now libcitadel is different because it has a corresponding -dev package, but ttbomk no other package uses it and the citadel packages themselves do have a hard dependency on the same version. Long talk made short, I would nevertheless prefer to have it right. Wilfried, could you do a fixed 8.14? Release team, would you consider unblocking 8.14? Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120719102826.ga16...@feivel.credativ.lan
