Your message dated Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:59:55 +0200
with message-id <20120728135955.go17...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#682467: unblock: blist/1.3.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #682467,
regarding unblock: blist/1.3.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
682467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682467
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package blist
Fixed RC bug #681583
unblock blist/1.3.4-2
diff -ruN export/debian/changelog blist-1.3.4/debian/changelog
--- export/debian/changelog 2012-07-23 00:29:25.089477000 -0400
+++ blist-1.3.4/debian/changelog 2012-07-23 00:45:37.229289894 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+blist (1.3.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload
+
+ [ Evgeni Golov ]
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Use dh_python2.
+ * Add python-all-dev to Build-Depends.
+ * Add python:Depends to Depends.
+ * This all closes: #681583
+
+ [ Scott Kitterman ]
+ * Add python-setuptools to Build-Depends
+ * Add missing Vcs-* to Control
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:40:43 -0400
+
blist (1.3.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release.
diff -ruN export/debian/control blist-1.3.4/debian/control
--- export/debian/control 2012-07-23 00:29:25.089477000 -0400
+++ blist-1.3.4/debian/control 2012-07-23 00:45:10.533290680 -0400
@@ -5,15 +5,18 @@
Uploaders:
Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org>
Build-Depends:
- debhelper (>= 9)
+ debhelper (>= 9), python-all-dev (>= 2.6.6-3~), python-setuptools
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Homepage: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/blist
+Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/blist/trunk
+Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/packages/blist/trunk/
Package: python-blist
Architecture: any
Depends:
${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends},
+ ${python:Depends}
Description: List-like type for python with better asymptotic performance
This package is a drop-in replacement for the Python list the provides better
performance when modifying large lists. The blist package also provides
diff -ruN export/debian/rules blist-1.3.4/debian/rules
--- export/debian/rules 2012-07-23 00:29:25.089477000 -0400
+++ blist-1.3.4/debian/rules 2012-07-23 00:42:46.077294949 -0400
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@
dh_clean
%:
- dh $@
+ dh $@ --with=python2
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 09:56:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, July 28, 2012 03:37:16 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 00:55:52 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: unblock
> > >
> > > Please unblock package blist
> > >
> > > Fixed RC bug #681583
> >
> > Would it be better to remove it instead? Before the fix, it has had one
> > upload ever, that shipped broken on everything but amd64, so I guess
> > it's not getting much use/attention.
>
> Clearly the impact of removal is low. Personally, since a fix is available,
> I'd be inclined to keep it, but either approach is reasonable.
>
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
