On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:55 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:15:49 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> >Are "vwm" and "vmm" supposed to be identical, other than the name
> >change?  The version of "vmm" shipped in -2 appears to include new
> >changes which are then not carried over in to "vmw":
> 
> no, that's not the case but seems a problem invented by debdiff:
> the package is git-hosted and -built and for some weird reason 
> debdiff hands out all kinds of weird deltas here...

debdiff is displaying it because it's what's in the source package:

adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x 
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-1.dsc v-m1
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x 
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-2.dsc v-m2
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ diff -adNru v-m1 v-m2 | diffstat
[...]
 vmm                           |   19 
 vwm                           | 1382 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 1414 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

If you think debdiff is buggy, please file appropriate bug reports.  The
above agrees with what is shows, however.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1343798528.1551.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to