On 13.08.2012 00:41, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
The bug corrected by this version is correctable only by re-building
as you are writing.
However, since 7.4.11 or more debhelper were required for this,
I updated debhelper to 9. Since Standards-Version was old, it
updated.
The issue is that in order to accept the changes, a reviewer needs to
satisfy themselves (at least I'd want to) that the old and new rules
files are equivalent. That's often not a trivial thing to do when a
custom rules file has been converted to short-form dh.
Probably, the renewal of debhelper and Standards-Version will be
unnecessary.
They /are/ unnecessary.
However, I think that the problem of #682051 is required as
PackagesQuality of ReleaseGoal.
Is the package which deleted unnecessary updating accepted?
You mean a package which is a no-changes source upload of the previous
package? That would certainly be acceptable, yes.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/3aef7747aa3ffb0f7c5c8a93b32bb...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
