On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 00:13 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: > Am 04.09.2012 21:33, schrieb Niels Thykier: > > On 2012-08-31 21:54, Tobias Hansen wrote: > >> > >> I'm not sure if my initial list was complete though. I didn't check for > >> reverse dependencies of libcap-dev. [...] > > I have rebuild the 16 packages in sid today > > Thanks! I looked at the reverse dependencies of libcap-dev and > libcap2-bin now and according to apt-cache the only additional one that > was not rebuilt yet is i3status. I just checked and it builds fine here > in a sid chroot. libpam-cap doesn't need to be considered, because it's new.
Thanks to both of you for the test re-builds. The only remaining query I had was regarding the libpam-cap split-off and how to handle the fact that people upgrading with the automatic installation of Recommends disabled will lose the PAM module during the upgrade. I don't think there's any realistic way to find out how many such users there are in testing or stable without exposing them to the changes; the more interesting and important question is how many of those people are actually using the PAM module. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1347735623.28617.86.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
