# On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 16:06 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: # > severity 689157 important # Bug #689157 [release.debian.org] unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.8 # Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
severity 689157 normal thanks Please don't do that. Everyone's unblock request is important to them, and many of them also fix RC bugs. unblock bugs are "normal" at most, unless the release team choose to make them otherwise. > block 687641 by 689157 > Bug #687641 [mediawiki-extensions-base] mediawiki-extensions-base: Fatal > error: Call to a member function isContentPage() on a non-object > 687641 was not blocked by any bugs. > 687641 was not blocking any bugs. > Added blocking bug(s) of 687641: 689157 If the bug is fixed in 2.8, surely the correct method of indicating that would be to close it with an appropriate fixed version? Leaving it open but blocked against the unblock request doesn't seem to make a great deal of sense, at least imo. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348937502.15180.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org