On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:59:37 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:

> > Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging
> > the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug
> > version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug).  So I don't
> > think this is a problem.
> 
> Please review the attached patch, and let me know if it is ok to
> upload to unstable.  The security issue is fixed, and the tool
> binaries are now not excluded from the -dbg package.
> 
Go ahead.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to