Op woensdag 6 maart 2013 10:16:18 schreef Adam D. Barratt: > It looks like the maintainer field is already fixed in sid, in > 2.10.0-1; that is a number of upstream releases more recent than the > current wheezy package, however. > > Your last message in #700719 indicates that your inclination towards an > unblock was based on the assumption that the package involved would be > 2.9.6; is that correct? Even after filtering the diff down quite a lot > to remove documentation changes etc. we still appear to be left with a > diff of " 217 files changed, 5476 insertions(+), 1476 deletions(-)" > which isn't that bad but not ideal at this point.
Right, since I posted my proposal indeed a new upstream has been uploaded on Monday to sid making the migration impossible. I do not advocate migrating 2.10.0. I was convinced that migration should be possible precisely because it was an upstream bugfix, not a new major rleease. I'd like to reword my proposal then to uploading 2.9.6-1, as it was in sid, to tpu. Only changes would be a new version number (2.9.6-1+wheezy1?) and fixed maintainer. My filtered diff of that, as attached to #700719, amounts to: 22 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) Cheers, Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
