Your message dated Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:49:15 +0000
with message-id <20130324204915.ga20...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#691115: unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #691115,
regarding unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
691115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package 'libdvdread4'
unblock libdvdread/4.2.0+20120521-3
This update fix crashes (#688574).
Full diff is attached.
Thank you.
Regards,
Dmitry.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 261169d..aab071b 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+libdvdread (4.2.0+20120521-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Adding patch from Peter Van Eynde <pvane...@debian.org> to fix
+ miscompilation leading to a segfault (Closes: #688574).
+
+ -- Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:00:28 +0200
+
diff --git a/debian/patches/09-segfault.patch b/debian/patches/09-segfault.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82c16ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/09-segfault.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+Author: Peter Van Eynde <pvane...@debian.org>
+Description: Fix miscompilation leading to a segfault (Closes: #688574).
+
+diff -Naurp libdvdread.orig/src/dvd_reader.c libdvdread/src/dvd_reader.c
+--- libdvdread.orig/src/dvd_reader.c 2012-09-24 16:55:49.681245164 +0200
++++ libdvdread/src/dvd_reader.c 2012-09-24 16:56:06.845356530 +0200
+@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
+ #include <string.h>
+ #include <ctype.h>
+ #define _GNU_SOURCE
++#define __USE_GNU
+ #include <unistd.h>
+ #include <limits.h>
+ #include <dirent.h>
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 79e397c..2eb96d6 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+09-segfault.patch
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:13:37PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> intrigeri wrote (27 Dec 2012 20:55:46 GMT) :
> > (Trying to make Wheezy better.)
>
> > Dmitry Smirnov wrote (15 Dec 2012 10:57:10 GMT) :
> >> I don't need to -- the original bug reporter (#688574) was not aware
> >> of similar cases. He had a perfect example of a problem and I just
> >> had a misfortune to discover another case of similar crash.
>
> > Two questions here:
>
> > 1. Do you think #688574 is serious enough to be worth fixing in
> > Wheezy? (If so, perhaps the bug priority should be revisited. Also,
> > given you've uploaded a new upstream version to unstable, a fix
> > would probably have to go through t-p-u.)
>
> No news a month later, which wouldn't have happened, I guess, if
> Daniel thought #688574 was RC. So, I suggest the release team closes
> this unblock request.
Thanks, closing.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
