Your message dated Sat, 27 Apr 2013 16:19:50 +0100 with message-id <1367075990.13168.72.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#694378: please allow up-to-date apt-cacher-ng in wheezy has caused the Debian Bug report #694378, regarding unblock: apt-cacher-ng/0.7.11-1 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694378: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694378 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt-cacher-ng it solves #683803 and #677983 (*) since version 0.7.8. These changes are especially required to support http.debian.net redirection properly and to stop the total breakage of "apt-get update" runs on some systems. There are upstream changes but I consider most of them harmless (I am upstream) or they have been tested in Unstable/Experimental for already 16 weeks. Little problems in 0.7.8's changes have been solved in 0.7.10 (18 days in Unstable without new bug reports). (*): assumed, no user complaints this time while previous fixing attempts caused very prompt responses $ debdiff apt-cacher-ng_0.7.6-1_amd64.deb apt-cacher-ng_0.7.10-1_amd64.deb File lists identical (after any substitutions) Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) ------------------------------------------------ Depends: libbz2-1.0, libc6 (>= 2.10), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), liblzma5 (>= [-5.1.1alpha+20110809),-] {+5.1.1alpha+20120614),+} libstdc++6 (>= 4.6), libwrap0 (>= 7.6-4~), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4), debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0, adduser Installed-Size: [-1158-] {+1175+} Version: [-0.7.6-1-] {+0.7.10-1+} unblock apt-cacher-ng/0.7.10-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.5.0+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 18:47 +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: > again (cf. #683803) I was bitten by (apt-cacher-ng 0.7.6-1): > > Sun Feb 17 11:47:50 > 2013|http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/popt/libpopt0_1.16-7_i386.deb storage > error [301 Moved Permanently], last errno: Operation now in progress > Sun Feb 17 11:56:55 > 2013|http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcap2/libcap2_2.22-1.2_i386.deb > storage error [301 Moved Permanently], last errno: Operation now in progress > > This happens rarely, but even with "RedirMax: 0", and it spoils the > debian-lan > setup. > > So please consider the fixed package for wheezy. Offering a fixed package > in backports doesn't make Debian better, because either you use the package > from > backports which will not be better by being in backports or you don't use > acng > at all - which will not need a fixed package. And it causes extra work > to include backport repositories, especially for debian-lan. I do hope I won't end up regretting doing so, but... unblocked. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---
