As I said, the texlive build system needs the configuration step even if the library is not used or build.
I don't need to say more, reading the build log and searching for "gd" is enough. > texlive-bin MUST NOT migrate to testing with embedded outdated libgd. Who decides that, you? >> The only program in TeX Live that is linked against libgd is >> dvipng and this is built outside of TeX live. > > Care to elaborate? Either you need the sources or you do not. Care to search for the "dvipng" package? I am not holding your and type for you, I have other things to do. > If it builds the library you should fix the CVEs or at least check > that the affected code in not used by dvipng. I told you that already! And dvipng is not my package. > That's not true, I have already uploaded fixed libgd2 to unstable. Good to know, still I actually don't see a need for pulling in a useless build dep if it is not necessary. > My > opinion Yes there are many opinions in the world. Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/60cb0fe5-6800-4080-935a-9073172c1...@logic.at
