Your message dated Sun, 8 Sep 2013 12:12:13 +0200 with message-id <20130908101213.ga21...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#714069: nmu: njplot_2.4-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #714069, regarding nmu: njplot_2.4-2 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 714069: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714069 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead of libvibrant6a. nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild against libvibrant6." Ansgar
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:40:09 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > On 06/25/2013 17:21, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 13:58:51 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > >> Please schedule a binNMU for njplot to make it pick up libvibrant6 instead > >> of > >> libvibrant6a. > >> > >> nmu njplot_2.4-2 . armel armhf mips s390 s390x sparc . -m "Rebuild against > >> libvibrant6." > >> > > Meh, the libvibrant6 name was already taken, renaming things back with > > an ABI break is a no-no. > > The library package is now named libvibrant6b and njplot should be > rebuilt on all architectures. > Scheduled. Cheers, Juliensignature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---