Julien, Excuse me. You mean I should have waited.
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tags -1 pending Thanks. I may have misunderstood the system. > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 23:37:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > Please allow us to make ibus transition 1.4 to 1.5 in terms of upstream > > API version. > Apparently you didn't need to wait for an answer... I thought the mail to debian-release ML: "bug 721844 is forwarded to http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ibus1.5.html"; was the ack and I thought ben toolchain triggers binNMU according to this action automatically. I am still new to this transition thing and a bit confused with the new ben and other things. Can I now upload packages which depends on ibus 1.5? * Am I blocked to make source update upload on packages with "collisions"? ibus-pinyin ??? * Those arch:all packages depending on -dev ibus-table = uploaded ibus-xkbc = planned to upload. OK??? * Those arch:any packages depending on -dev and have new source updates. ibus-array = uploaded ibus-chewing = uploaded ibus-m17n = uploaded ... some more but OK??? * Those arch:any packages depending on -dev and have no source updates. I do not need to do anything but wait binnmu. Correct??? Regards, Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130908160340.GB23884@goofy.localdomain
