On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Adam D. Barratt
<a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-12-14 at 15:46 +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
>> Anything still wrong/missing here?
>
> Someone reviewing the patch, at least.
I've preferred lazy approach: picking upstream git commit as is. IMHO
it's not worth improving it for instance by removing Ifdefs according
to specific wheezy libav{codec,util,format} versions.
>> I thought it was fine for 7.3.
>
> For it to get in to 7.3 you'd have needed to have uploaded a new
> package. I'm not sure how you reach the conclusion of "it was fine for
> 7.3" with no upload having occurred (or being ACKed).
I would have uploaded it once ACKed, as recommended by developer's
reference section 5.5.1.
By "it was fine for 7.3", I meant patch wasn't bad and there was
enough time to review, ack, etc..
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CABcaWC3oVP3HOeCBL2xR83jmm=krta1_vaqsrkavksnewtr...@mail.gmail.com
