On Monday, February 03, 2014 22:25:23 Robert Edmonds wrote: > Chris Knadle wrote: > > On Friday, January 31, 2014 15:18:18 Robert Edmonds wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Chris Knadle's input in #737246 makes me believe that the changes in > > > 2.5.0-6 / -7 just aren't correct. I'm thinking we should probably go > > > back to the approach in 2.5.0-5 (though with a fallback atomic > > > implementation for architectures where the default gcc is < 4.7). > > > > Unfortunately the feedback I gave you about protobuf 2.5.0-6 / -7 turns > > out > > to have been wrong; my local cowbuilder had something weird going on. > > That > > mumble works when built against protobuf 2.5.0-7 got reported to me in > > #737223 by Gonéri Le Bouder, with after some efforts was able to > > replicate with cowbuilder. > > Hi, Chris: > > After further investigation, reading upstream bug #351, and commits > r409, r410, r413, r414, and r415 [1], I'm not convinced that the changes > I made in protobuf 2.5.0-6 / -7 are complete, and in any case I'm now no > longer convinced that it's feasible to forward port the "once" > implementation from protobuf <= 2.4.1 to later versions.
Okay. Yeah I looked at #351 I see what you mean. > I've uploaded protobuf 2.5.0-8 to experimental, which has the exact same > ABI/API as protobuf 2.5.0-5. Can you tell me if the current version of > mumble in the archive works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8, once it's > available at your mirror? (I suspect that it will, but just want to > make sure.) Yes, the existing 1.2.4-0.1+b1 in Unstable works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8. > I am pretty sure 2.5.0-8 will not work on ia64 or sparc, where the > default compiler is gcc-4.6, but it also seems that this problem is not > so serious now. Right. > > Should I file a release.debian.org bug to binNMU mumble? > > I think this is a problem in the protobuf transition, so #726165 is the > right bug for this discussion :-) ;-) Makes sense. > That is, with protobuf 2.5.0-8 there should be no additional binNMUs > required. If that's the case, I'll upload -8 to unstable as -9, > provided it is acceptable to break the architectures with the old > gcc-4.6 compiler. I think thats fine concerning mumble. -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/10019212.SdvrCvNV5g@trelane