On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:16:05PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > (Putting the bug back into the loop.) > > On 2014-02-16 21:47:25, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 03:44:01PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> > > > wrote: > > > > Reinhard Tartler <siret...@tauware.de> schrieb: > > > >> Package: release.debian.org > > > >> Severity: normal > > > >> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > > > >> Usertags: transition > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> We have a new libav transition pending. Libav 10 is prepared in > > > >> debian/experimental, and I've started to build packges against this new > > > >> version; in fact, more or more packages require Libav 10 and the new > > > >> APIs it provides. > > > > > > > > Is the alpha2 version in experimental final in terms of API > > > > deprecations? > > > > > > It should be. I intend to release and upload 10_beta1 to experimental > > > by end of this weekend (tomorrow latest), and includes some additions > > > that happened after alpha2 (i.e., there will be a shlibs, but no > > > SONAME bump). Neverthless, I think it should be safe. > > > > Ok. I'll run a test build against libav/exp and file bugs against all > > packages > > which fail. > > Thank you Moritz for doing the test build. I've added usertags to the > bugs you've already filed (user > pkg-multimeida-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, usertag libav10): > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org;tag=libav10
I'm already doing the same, haven't announced it yet since the rebuild isn't fully finished. Better use this one instead: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libav10;users=j...@debian.org Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140218194828.GA22598@pisco.westfalen.local