ping.
2014-03-07 9:02 GMT+09:00 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwama...@debian.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, this work is delayed.
> Most of the files in modules/gpu/test/nvidia/ is DFSG Non-free.
> They are also provided the latest OpenCV, but the license was changed by
> commit f0b19d4659045b00c55f849187cd657b21a13e5d.
> It took a patch from commit the license was modified. And I fix the
> problems in the license by applying.
>
> I updatred debdiff. Could you check this?
>
> Best regards,
> Nobuhiro
>
> 2013-10-07 Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org>:
>> Control: tag -1 wheezy moreinfo
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwama...@debian.org> (2013-10-07):
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: pu
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose an upgrade of opencv.
>>>
>>> opencv distributed in wheezy includes source code of non-free (#724920).
>>> I want to solve this problem.
>>> Source code of the target is the code for test. It does not affect the
>>> actual working.
>>>
>>> I attached debdiff. Could you consider this change suitable for
>>> stable-proposed-updates?
>>
>> (for the records, we usually prefer when bugs are fixed in testing /
>> unstable before considering updates in stable.) Anyway, if the files
>> indeed got relicensed under a suitable license, why should they get
>> removed from an earlier release? At best we could ship a package with
>> updated headers and licensing info to reflect the facts all those files
>> are actually OK?
>>
>> Mraw,
>> KiBi.
>
> --
> Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
> iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
> GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/cabmqnvkgbs3qz68cnchpwgrk0bdgufnv1fyblbynquac-p3...@mail.gmail.com
