Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 16:00:43 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#757590: nmu: xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #757590,
regarding nmu: xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
757590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
It looks like xdmf was built in an unclean environment by the uploader.
It has a dependency on libhdf5-8 which is only available in
experimental. Please binNMU xdmf:
nmu xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in clean environment."
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/08/14 17:50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
>
> It looks like xdmf was built in an unclean environment by the uploader.
> It has a dependency on libhdf5-8 which is only available in
> experimental. Please binNMU xdmf:
>
> nmu xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in clean environment."
Scheduled.
Thanks,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
