On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:55:15PM +0200, Bjoern Boschman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > moin, > > to sum things up: > > * mariadb-5.5 within testing > * mariadb-10.0 within experimental > * mysql-5.5 within testing > * mysql-5.6 within experimental > * percona-xtradb-cluster-server-5.5 within sid > > - From my point of view we should not talk about > percona-xtradb-cluster-server as a mysql replacement as it does not > provide any libs nor -dev packages and will always be a very close > relative to mysql. > > Although my opinion is to let Debian users decide which fork to use I > can fully understand release/security team concerns. > > So which way to go? > * stick with mysql and start transition -> 5.6 > * replace mysql with mariadb and start transition -> 10.0 > * create an ecosystem where several forks may live side by side > > pkg-mysql is unfortunately not one of the strongest teams in terms of > manpower, but even though we tried to come up with a solution to > fullfil anybodys wishes. > > > As the transition timeframe is quite close we need a decision! > This decision should be done by the release team agreed together with > your collegues at ubuntu/canonical as we should definately *not* fork > this decision! > > Maybe the tech-ctte could also be involved?
Has there been any progress? The freeze is coming closer. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140917195709.GA5801@pisco.westfalen.local