Bill, I am very sorry that I have not Cced everything related to the libjpeg-transition to you. I have honestly believed that you and everyone else involved was following the transition plan as mentioned in #717076#225. As for the takover of the libjpeg62* packages it was discussed in the transition plan bug #754988.
As for -progs package - if you think it would be useful to remove them from src:libjpeg-turbo, I would remove them from src:libjpeg-turbo as it's only transitional package to help the users to migrate from old default jpeg library to the new one. For the other unfortunatly this is necessary to get the transition going. I'm really sorry to not have CCed before the transition have started. If you have any better proposal how to continue with the transition I am very happy to discuss it further #754988, so we keep the release team involved, since we are on very tight time schedule before the next stable is frozen. I'm happy to continue the discussion now, even thought it's a bit under time pressure. If there's something I could make better without too much delay I'd be happy doing it. Cheers, Ondrej On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, at 18:48, Bill Allombert wrote: > Source: libjpeg-turbo > Version: 1:1.3.1-3 > Severity: serious > > Dear maintainers, > > libjpeg-turbo is hijacking binaries from other source packages: > > libjpeg-progs : provided by libjpeg8 > libjpeg62 libjpeg62-dbg libjpeg62-dev: provided by libjpeg6b > > Please correct this as soon as possible. > > Cheers, > -- > Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> > > Imagine a large red swirl here. > -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1412016916.655298.173092181.308c1...@webmail.messagingengine.com