On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 19:15 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Op maandag 12 januari 2015 08:15:39 schreef Adam D. Barratt: > > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 06:47 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > > binutils was recently updated in wheezy-security and wheezy-p-u to fix > > > a number of security issues identified in DSA-3123-1; of these, a > > > number concern binutils-mingw-w64 as well, so it would be great if it > > > could be rebuilt in those suites... (It will pick up the patches from > > > binutils-source.) > > > > We won't schedule binNMUs in -security for packages that DSAs haven't > > been issued for, at least not without the security team's request / > > agreement - it's just going to confuse everyone. > > This is not something we do very routinely, so I'd like to confirm: if these > binNMU's are triggered for stable-security, do they still end up in the > security-master queue so they can be released in a coordinated way?
I think so, but it's nothing something I've any experience with for the security archive either; might be worth confirming with ftp-master? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1421086708.29297.4.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
