Le 2015-02-18 09:38, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
And if you don't agree, then I would be interested to know what could bring you the required confidence so that we can gain that status (maybe adding autopkgtests to reverse dependencies and running those tests, or stuff like that).
The list of packages that we started with are the ones that give more trouble to the security team. Maybe the list should be expanded, I don't know. Most probably. What we would like to have is a general discussion (not now please... but after jessie release) to put some criteria to help to distinguish packages that need a special treatement and others that don't. For now, the criteria has been "security team has trouble with X" but I don't find this criteria good enough. The autopkgtests might be part of the answer, but not the only one I hope. Regards, -- Mehdi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a9c0b395a32dffb5ece4cfa864808...@dogguy.org