Control: tag -1 confirmed

Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> (2015-03-08):
> On 2015-02-09 22:14, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Le dimanche, 8 février 2015, 21.54:04 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> >> Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> (2015-02-06):
> >>> [...]
> >> Since d-i-n-i is basically about collecting files in packages (see
> >> get-images.sh), and about shipping them through various binaries, this
> >> kind of things is /possibly/ harmless, but I really didn't check
> >> anything. It would probably be helpful to double check that dh 7 and
> >> dh 9 lead to identical binaries, and maybe think about letting this
> >> change slide with the rest (but so far I really have no opinion on
> >> this).
> > 
> > So I've gone and done that (twice), the result of all debdiffs is exactl 
> > identical:
> > 
> >> File lists identical (after any substitutions)
> >>
> >> No differences were encountered between the control files
> > 
> > This show that the change (but also that the revert) is harmless. 
> > Frankly, I'd find the "explicit no-go therefore imposing a revert" quite 
> > silly in this specific case.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> KiBi, if you (as d-i RM) are happy with that, I am willing to make the
> exception - you are the one that gets to keep the pieces if it breaks. :)

Sure, fair enough; let's do that, ta!

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to