On 17/12/15 14:09, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> writes: > >> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> writes: >> >>> On 16/12/15 00:12, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >>> >>>> Niko Tyni <nt...@debian.org> writes: >>>> >>>>> So the proper way out seems to be a separate libdlm source package, as >>>>> discussed in [1]. Ferenc, do I understand right that a new pacemaker >>>>> package is a blocker for this? Is that because the current pacemaker >>>>> would be broken by the libdlm update? >>>> >>>> No: the new DLM package depends on the new Pacemaker package. I'm >>>> already testing them, there's only some cleanup remaining before they >>>> can be uploaded. Both will go through NEW though, so it will take some >>>> time. >>> >>> I can speed things up if they block a transition... Got an eta for this? >> >> That sounds useful! I expect to get pacemaker_1.1.13-1 ready for upload >> today, taking some shortcuts. > > Now the Perl transition is rolling and I can't build Pacemaker anymore, > because some of its build dependencies are broken. Is there still a > reason to hurry the uploads?
Yes, it'd be good to get this fixed ASAP, so that we can rebuild or remove redhat-cluster. The perl rdeps should be installable again at some point today, hopefully. Cheers, Emilio
