On 06-12-15 17:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 03-12-15 19:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 03/12/15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> Because libgsl0-dev is not a transitional package to pull in libgsl-dev >>> and libgsl2, all gsl rdeps need to update their build dependencies >>> before rebuilding with GSL 2. This affected siril (0.9.1-1) for example, >>> the new upstream release fixes the GSL 2 build failure, but via the >>> libgsl0-dev build dependency the old GSL 1 packages were used to build it. >>> >>> We should probably file bugs for all these packages that otherwise build >>> successfully, because binNMUs don't actually build with GSL 2 as long as >>> the GSL 1.x package are still in unstable too. >> >> libgsl0-dev could be removed... I have asked for that but the ftp team seems >> to >> be too busy... > > To not be dependent on the removal by the FTP masters, I've filed bugs > for all remaining packages with patches to update their build > dependencies for GSL 2.
Thanks to Mattia Rizzolo for the many recent NMUs fixing most of the remaining packages that hadn't been updated for GSL 2 yet. This transition is now at 95%. The packages still marked as bad in the transition tracker are mostly sid only. freefem++ cannot be built currently due to the openmpi transition (#813128). apophenia, asymptote, rivet, thepeg & herwig++ are only partially good due to build failures on some architectures. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
