-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 01/02/2016 15:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/02/16 12:41, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> >> The upload of openmpi1.10 triggered an auto-openmpi transition, as >> expected and wanted. >> The rest, is premature. > > The problem is that you uploaded the package directly to unstable, without > asking for a transition slot and without fixing those problems you mention > beforehand. It'd have been better to upload it to experimental until things were > ready. Yes. I don't know why the package ended up in unstable, as I was uploading to 'experimental'. > > Since that has already happened, it'd be good to know what packages build fine > against the new openmpi and which ones don't. > > Cheers, > Emilio I'm rebuilding at the moment. Currently blacs-mpi and adios fail to compile against the new openmpi (all other level 1 work fine); this is due to 1.10 not shipping libmpi_f77 libmpi_f90 (instead shipping libmpi_mpife) which I'm working on fixing. regards Alastair - -- Alastair McKinstry, <alast...@sceal.ie>, <mckins...@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWsFvuAAoJEMvmu05dmtOlkfAP/iMg2s2WbLerCIt4AY+9ya4f g26o1Gqr1BuzfIj7+mHeaorzASqZBVrAUpxqVzejWDWqwb95s/e6GhKryXdq8IJY 7JAHcCKolYSE1qwAxA9Dyyb1e1DGSxKrqkkSGo7pmv3ViziW7USbws9Uq/gFXGcR 1MObscyzYOceNOkdb7ZQCIX35qD2UlPjDkFrKRDvk36Hn6zvhTUJxbkJJW41L/PM rMfYhsPr5Yv4UdtynBUAekiGO/lActtVPyp31Jf0DsrYK1ojnCpNXW80NNH77w1d YF71VYpNj6S4Tof+Dvcofku0X3cBGL2tPBLjSZlcLqbefXdcHCOQx13/k/Np78Vn 9R0s6Hcvq2OmvDrqfFoSOFAI3w2m9JwgSVeJrxHPkehIRekW0a20y69xdjqheR8j KqZUmwAt/FkYX8krHkTB/lI8HdoyXspguQXR79/0ganXqk8uNOXy7J4cUUA06/SR z/KDJaKv4EyvHxFgrnVNdGJKFamEUJ5IjzULClnzw4j8JvNyPsNduwbbKav3k1ne 1uzFkH/Fc4FcA/4OQ42vqb71v+zxgsH6fdjxmpSU0xx+WP76Jvy90PDmAWAyrPOZ NqliFFTdbdwa1cq6GGoCFaKZ38YFqLj0V3Z+9pTw+Entf1qiLSKxhq2wdShTwJO+ GhTPI3lHeqUWunsr7/WY =74on -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
