On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 01:55:55 +0000, Chris Knadle wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > > On 19/03/16 19:23, Chris Knadle wrote: > >> Greetings. > >> > >> Executive summary: > >> I'd like to know if there is metadata that can be added to the Qt4 and Qt5 > >> packages (qt4-x11 and qtbase-opensource-src) which will indicate that they > >> need to be binNMUed for OpenSSL transitions at nearly the same time that > >> Mumble gets binNMUed. > [...] > >> Is this possible? > > > > There's no way to express that kind of relationship. Not unless you get into > > complex territory which isn't really worth it in this case. Normally binNMUs > > are scheduled at the same time, so in theory this shouldn't be such a big > > issue. And it would only affect unstable users, only for a short amount of > > time. > > Ehhh... okay. The last OpenSSL binNMU had an 11-day difference between > Mumble getting rebuilt and qt4-x11 being rebuilt in Sid. That's a short > time in release terms, but a long time in terms of users finding Mumble > broken and waiting for it to be fixed. > > Either way I have my answer. Thank you very much. > What would it take to fix qt to properly link with libssl?
Cheers, Julien